Campaign Trail Results: Game #1304862

This Game:

  • Year: 1896
  • Player Candidate: William Jennings Bryan
  • Running Mate: Arthur Sewall
  • Difficulty Level: Hard
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • troosvelt68
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- William McKinley3868,352,66859.93
---- John Palmer451,013,3537.27
---- William Jennings Bryan164,571,24932.80

Answers:

  • Which of the following most closely matches your overall campaign message?
    I am 100% committed to the coinage of silver. It's important however, that we strike a moderate tone on other issues to expand our appeal as widely as we can.
  • What do you have to say about William McKinley's campaign, at a high level?
    We may have our disagreements, but William McKinley is an honorable man. Our campaign will focus on the issues, not on the opponent.
  • Can you respond to rumors that you would seek to abolish the Supreme Court if elected, due to their recent decisions on the income tax and antitrust issues?
    The Supreme Court has consistently stood in the way of progress by implementing an overly narrow interpretation of the Constitution. I support drastic measures to reduce its influence.
  • The novelty of a personal visit from the "Great Commoner" could probably swing the West Coast states in your direction. However, it will take two weeks to travel and return via train.
    Will you divert your attention from the Midwest long enough to visit California, Oregon, and Washington?

    Let's keep the tour as short as possible. I will take a train to San Francisco and deliver a few speeches in that city, but will not tour the entire coast.
  • You have very little chance of winning New York this fall, and nearly all of that city's newspapers are anti-Bryan. That doesn't mean you couldn't draw a frenzied crowd in New York City.
    Perhaps the media attention would be beneficial in building excitement for your campaign on a national scale?

    New York is a traditional Democratic stronghold, and I'm confident that the people of that state will support my message. We will campaign there extensively.
  • Critics have said that you wrap yourself in religious imagery too much for a presidential candidate. What is your response?
    The humblest citizen in all the land, when clad in the armor of a righteous cause, is stronger than all the hosts of error.
  • You have alluded to the need for less prejudice between the races. Senator "Pitchfork" Ben Tillman, of South Carolina, privately seeks your clarification.
    Can you reassure him that the federal government will respect the rights of the states under your Administration?

    There has been a deafening silence for many years on the issue of equal rights in the South. It's time we had a true enforcement of the 14th and 15th Amendment.
  • Governor Altgeld of Illinois has proposed that you appear with him in Chicago for a couple of big speeches. Later on he would appear with you in southern Illinois to solidify his support with rural voters. What do you think of this idea?
    Altgeld is free to appear with me at any event, but I will not rearrange my entire schedule to suit his needs.
  • What do you think of leaving the Midwest for a week and making a circuit of the crucial upper South states? (i.e. Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky)
    It's a shame that we need to even campaign in these beacons of the South. But if we have to, let us do it with effluence.
  • In an unusual move, the Populist Party has supported you for President while nominating their own running-mate. The man is Thomas Watson of Georgia -- a known radical. What do you have to say about this bizarre situation?
    We have chosen our running mate and our ticket is set. I don't know what they are trying to accomplish.
  • Can you state your definitive position on the American monetary system?
    I support a strict adherence to the gold standard, which is fundamental to American prosperity.
  • What is your definitive position on the tariff issue?
    We need high tariffs on a variety of products and commodities to stimulate American manufacturing.
  • The United States is in the midst of a financial calamity, with masses of unemployed men on the streets. What will you do to revive business in this country?
    We need to reaffirm our commitment to non-intervention in business affairs. Companies need stability before they will have the confidence to expand.
  • Grover Cleveland sent federal troops to Illinois to end the Pullman Strike without the request of Governor Altgeld. Was this an overreach on his part?
    Bargaining for wages is the business of a man and his employer. Collective bargaining has no place in American society, and I commend Grover Cleveland for having the courage to act decisively.
  • What is your opinion on measures that would aim to restrict the sale or production of alcohol?
    It is my dream to see a Prohibition Amendment passed before I die.
  • Should there be greater regulation or even price controls on railroad shipping rates?
    Only on rare occasions where there is a clear abuse from the railroads. For the most part they simply charge what the traffic will bear.
  • Would you ever consider government ownership of the railroads?
    The government provided the land that these railroads were built upon. When the railroads gouge the consumer in turn, the government has every right to take ownership of them.
  • A few western states have allowed women the right to vote. Do you take the calls for a women's suffrage Amendment seriously?
    I would support such an Amendment if it gained traction within our system. I'm just sorry to see that the chances seem unlikely.
  • Some people have suggested implementing a minimum wage, under which people may not be employed. Do you think this would help increase wages or would it simply put more men out of work?
    There are individuals in this country working for less than a dollar a day. Only through desperation would a man ever consent to such an arrangement.
  • Do you believe that America has a duty to civilize the lesser nations of the earth?
    Where possible, we should certainly allow other places in the world to benefit from a knowledge of our political and economic systems.
  • Would you support federal "Blue Laws" to protect the sanctity of Sunday?
    At the very least, a federal law prohibiting the sale of alcohol of Sunday seems appropriate.
  • Should corporations be permitted to hire private detectives for security, and to infiltrate into labor movements?
    I don't see who has the authority to stop this. This is another example of regulation that would fall outside of the scope of the Commerce Clause in the Constitution.
  • Are you pleased with the recent defeat in Congress of the Pacific Railroad Funding Bill, which would have provided federal support to the Southern and Central Pacific railroads.
    It is my firm position that we need to nationalize the railroads of this country. Their power has stood beyond reproach for too long.
  • Is it generally appropriate for federal courts to issue injunctions against striking unions?
    The Pullman Strike of 1894 disrupted half of the nation's rail traffic and threatened to throw our society into complete turmoil. A small group of radicals should never have the power to disrupt the lives of millions.
  • There is one week left until election day. Every state is important, but where will you give an extra push with your personal campaigning to swing the final results?
    Indiana has always been the critical swing state. Let's spend most of our time there while also crossing over into Illinois and Kentucky.