Campaign Trail Results: Game #992624

This Game:

  • Year: 1844
  • Player Candidate: James K. Polk
  • Running Mate: George Dallas
  • Difficulty Level: Impossible
  • Winner Take All Mode?: Yes
  • Game Played:
  • oliver.h.shulman
Previous Game Next Game
View overall results, or a specific state:
CandidateElectoral VotesPopular VotesPop. Vote %
---- Henry Clay2481,449,61353.57
---- James K. Polk271,201,59244.40
---- James Birney055,0642.03
---- John Tyler000.00

Answers:

  • What points will emphasize in your acceptance letter, as you accept the Democratic nomination for President?
    I will open with a defense of the annexation of Texas, and then spend the rest of the letter attacking Henry Clay and his obfuscations on the issue.
  • You are known as a supporter of annexation on the Texas front. Do you have anything you would like to add, now that you have been nominated?
    We must annex Texas immediately.
  • John Tyler is pleased with your position on the Texas issue, and is prepared to withdraw his candidacy. Can you give him assurances that certain appointees of his will be safe in their positions, should you be elected?
    Getting Tyler out of the race is worth it. He can send us a reasonable list of people who will stay on when we're elected.
  • Cassius Clay, a cousin of Henry Clay, has published a letter stating Henry Clay is in accord with the abolitionist movement. Should your party disseminate copies of this letter as an attack?
    Let's not appear too hasty here. We need to run as a national party and avoid alienating Northerners.
  • Do you believe that any Southern Whig can call themselves a supporter of slavery, so long as Henry Clay equivocates on the Texas issue?
    Mr. Clay has certainly shown unusual reticence on the Texas issue, but many Southern Whigs are perfectly fine people.
  • Do you have any statement on the presence of Theodore Frelinghuysen on the Whig ticket, and his association with known anti-Catholic agitators?
    The Democratic Party is a friend of the working-class, and of immigrants from abroad. We denounce the vile bigotry of the Whig Party, as evidenced by Frelinghuysen.
  • For better or worse, many view you as a protege of Andrew Jackson (some call you “Young Hickory”). Is it better to embrace this label, or to distance yourself from it?
    There's no need to talk about Andrew Jackson at this point. Let's focus on Texas and other issues of our current time, rather than rehashing the battles of a decade ago.
  • Henry Clay supports the idea that the federal government should purchase the telegraph patent and manage the technology. To what extent should you attack him on this?
    We don't need to hammer on the internal improvements issue. We have other things to talk about which will better unite the party.
  • Should your party attack Henry Clay's personal conduct? His gambling, womanizing, dueling, and generally irreligious nature?
    I don't think that personal conduct is a good issue to bring into this campaign.
  • Silas Wright, the protege and successor to Van Buren, has been mentioned as a candidate for Governor of New York. He seems hesitant. Will you write him a letter imploring him to enter the race?
    This is an issue of state politics that I will stay removed from.
  • There have recently been riots and armed clashes between nativists and Irish immigrants in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Do you have any plans to condemn the nativist violence in these episodes?
    I don't want to address civil disorder directly, but we should be clear that we oppose any changes to our naturalization laws.
  • What do you make of Martin Van Buren's 1842 visit to Henry Clay's estate? Is Clay too friendly with Northern interests?
    This incident was a source of insinuation against Van Buren during the nomination battle. In the main election, however, we shouldn't mention anything that could cause a rift in the party.
  • Would you support the annexation of Texas, even without an agreement with Mexico, and a possible war?
    I would hope that we could negotiate an annexation with Mexico before moving forward, to avoid any diplomatic incidents.
  • What should your party's position be on the Tariff of 1842, which increased tariffs?
    We must rescind this tariff and replace it with something much lower. I support free trade and low tariffs.
  • Do you believe that some revenue should be set aside from our tariffs to finance internal improvements, such as canals and roads?
    This is one of the key objectives of our current tariff policy, and I would support a strong infrastructure program as President.
  • What is your current position on the banking system?
    I support our current free banking system, and I see no need for the Treasury to insulate its operations from the state-chartered banks.
  • Do you support an Amendment that would limit the President to a single term in office?
    I don't think that this is a necessary step, at this time.
  • Do you support the lifting of the Gag Rule in Congress?
    Regardless of our feelings about the slavery issue, it is undemocratic for Congress to deny the people the right to petition the government. I believe the Gag Rule should be lifted.
  • Would you sign a law that lowered tariffs below the level needed to protect American industry from foreign imports?
    I would gladly sign such a bill into law.
  • Do you have any statement to make on John Calhoun's “Packenham Letter”, stating slavery to be a positive blessing, and justifying the annexation of Texas as a pro-slavery move?
    I disagree with John Calhoun across the board, which leads to my opposition to the annexation of Texas.
  • Do you support any changes to our current naturalization laws?
    Only some very minor changes, like increasing the waiting period before new citizens may vote.
  • Regardless of your personal feelings, would you sign an act which established an independent Treasury for the government's funds?
    The creation of an independent Treasury will be one of the key initiatives of my Presidency.
  • What is your position on the Oregon boundary question?
    I would support any agreement, as long as the United States keeps the land that is south and east of the Colombia River.
  • Do you have any criticism of the authorities in Illinois, regarding their failure to properly protect Joseph Smith before his assassination in June?
    This is not an issue that we plan to address in our campaign.
  • Is there a particular state where your party should concentrate its resources and most talented speakers as the election draws near?
    New York